Visit the APA Web Site The Northstar Chapter - Return to Home Page


Members
| Contact Us | Site Map

  Return to Home Page

UPDATE! - Senate Votes to Derail Implementation of White Collar Exemption Regulations.

On May 4, the U.S. Senate voted to approve two provisions offered as amendments to an unrelated tax bill that would derail or limit implementation of the recently published final regulations revising the definitions of who is exempt from the minimum wage and overtime requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act as a "white collar" employee.  At press time, this bill was still being debated and had not yet been voted on by the Senate. Action by the House is also still to come.

The above information was taken from the Payroll Currently, Issue #10 dated May 14, 2004.


On April 20, 2004, the U.S. Department of Labor issues final regulations revising the definitions of who is exempt from the minimum wage and overtime requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act as a “white collar” employee for the first time in more than 50 years.

The DOL has created a “FairPay” web site providing information on the final rules at: http://www.dol.gov/esa/regs/compliance/whd/fairpay/main.htm

bullet

Any employee earning less than $455 a week will be a nonexempt employee entitled to overtime pay.

bullet

The percentage restrictions on nonexempt work in the current ‘long’ duties tests are eliminated.

bullet

The regulations will take effect on August 23, 2004.

bullet

The compensation threshold for the ‘highly compensated employee’ exemption is raised to $100,000.

bullet

Without affecting their employees’ exempt status, employers may take deductions from accrued leave accounts.

A link is provided to the National APA web site so you can review the regulations in further detail - http://www.americanpayroll.org/currently/pcwebpage

State Developments Concerning Payroll Debit Cards

The interest in the use of payroll debit cards as a payment option to reach the unbanked worker population has increased in the last year.  Stored value card use will continue to grow in the future.  A few states have addressed this issue and we will probably see more legislative sessions addressing debit cards.

bullet

Commonwealth of Virginia in their recent bill actually created some barriers:  The bill mandated the creation of trust accounts when employers set up payroll debit card programs.  A trust account would be set up for each employee in the program with the employee named as the beneficiary.  The general practice has been to set up a single aggregate account and this trust concept could make these programs cost prohibitive.  They will work on correcting some of the language which would eliminate this trust requirement and naming a beneficiary.

bullet

The Delaware Department of Labor issued proposed regulations to allow employers to issue payroll debit cards to workers as long as they provide the functional equivalent of cash or a check that allows full payment of wages on the worker’s payday without cost to the worker.  Proposed regulations would allow employers to pass on some of the administrative costs associated to a payroll debit card program to the unbanked worker who voluntarily signs up for the employer’s program.  However, Delaware is also proposing “individual accounts” and setting up individual accounts for each worker’s debit card may be too expensive for an employer.

Check Cashing Fees Imposed on Non-accountholders by Banks Create a Dilemma for California Employers and the State’s Labor Agency

bullet

On March 14, 2004, the San Francisco Chronicle ran an article highlighting the fact that some California banks have begun charging a $5.00 fee to workers who cash their paycheck without having an account at that bank.  This new policy even applies to workers who present their paycheck at a local branch of a bank where their employer’s payroll account is actually held.  

bullet

The California Department of Industrial Relations (CDIR) has ruled that employers who allow such a fee to be charged to their workers when they cash their paychecks at the employer’s bank were in violation of Section 212 of California’s labor code.  When the CDIR becomes aware that an employer has violated Section 212 of the California Labor Code, the CDIR can fine the employer $100 for the first time a fee is charged to a worker to cash their paycheck.  For each subsequent violation, the CDIR can assess a $200 fine on the employer, plus an additional 25% of the amount deducted from each of the worker’s paychecks. 

bullet

On May 31, 2004, APA joined a panel of speakers to testify before the California State Senate Banking, Commerce & International Trade Committee to discuss the impact of these bank fees on workers, employers, and payroll professionals.  The purpose of this initial hearing was to help legislators gather information about the entire issue so that they may potentially create a legislative solution for this employer problem.

Recent Developments in Child Support

Nevada

bullet

Nevada mandated a new child support withholding fee of $2.00 for each employee effective July 1, 2003.  This new employer-collected fee is required to be sent separately to the Nevada State Treasurer and cannot accompany the child support garnishments that are collected and remitted to the state.

bullet

Employers are not required to withhold the fee until they receive official notification from the state in the form of a mass mailer or a revised income withholding notice.  Out of state employers are not required to collect the fee.  However, if they are collecting the option $3.00 employer cost recovery fee, then they should collect and remit the new $2.00 withholding fee.

Massachusetts

bullet

Effective January 1, 2004, Massachusetts implemented new regulations that obligate employers to remit child support payments via EFT once they achieve a threshold of five or more child support withholding orders.  This mandate also applies to employers who have a payment history with the Child Support Enforcement Division of the Department of Revenue that includes two or more checks that have been returned for insufficient funds or irregular/untimely payments.

bullet

An employer who is required to participate in this new EFT child support remittance program must register with the agency before transmitting funds and must validate employees’/obligor’s personal identifying information with the agency’s child support enforcement automated data system.

bullet

Employers using payroll service providers may elect to have their provider remit these child support withholding funds electronically to the Department of Revenue’s Child Support Enforcement Division.

Changes to Deferred Compensation Plans

bullet

Annual deferral limits for 401k, 403b, SEP, and 457:  2004: $13K; 2005: $14K; 2006 and forward: $15K

bullet

Catch-up allowed for participants who will turn 50 during the plan year (not limited by any other plan or discrimination rules):  2004: $3K; 2005: $4K; 2006 and forward: $5K

bullet

All the states with an income tax follow these changes, except for:  NJ – follows EGTRRA for 401k, but does not exempt contributions to other deferred compensation plans (457, 403b, SIMPLE, and SEP).  PA – 401k and all other employee-deferral retirement plans are completely taxable.

APA Makes Headway with IRS on Improving Some Forms and Publications:

bullet

Form 941, State Code Box:  Clarified for EFTPS users that you should indicate the state of the bank branch from which taxes are paid, if it is different than the state in the employer’s address on the 941.  Look for the redesign of Form 941.

bullet

W-2 box 10, Dependent Care Benefits:  Forfeitures do not have to be subtracted from the amount to be reported.

bullet

W-2 box 11, Nonqualified Plans:  Instructions will be updated with APA-written language.

bullet

W-2 box 12, Instructions tell employers to combine regular and “catch-up” contributions into a single sum for each code.

bullet

W-2 box 13, Instructions use APA-written language explaining when to check the “retirement plan” box.

bullet

Form W-4, directly underneath the title of the part of the form that the employee provides to the employer, states:  “Your employer must send a copy of this form to the IRS if (a) you claim more than 10 allowances or (b) you claim “Exempt” and your wages are normally more than $200 per week.”

bullet

Fill-in version of Forms W-2c and W-3c are available on the APA Web Site
bullet

www.americanpayroll.org/news/formW2c.html

bullet

Note:  Fill out the form on your computer screen, print out all copies you need, give it to your employee, and file it with the SSA.  The Social Security Administration has approved this form.

The above information was taken from the Legislative and Regulatory Update Super Session at the American Payroll Association’s 22nd Annual Congress – presenters were Scott Mezistrano, CPP and Andrew McDevitt.

 

APA Northstar Chapter
P.O. Box 131412
St. Paul MN  55113-0012
Home Page Links: | Contact Us | Site Map | Members
Current Page: Privacy Policy