|
| |
UPDATE! -
Senate Votes to Derail Implementation of White Collar Exemption Regulations.
On May 4, the U.S. Senate voted to approve
two provisions offered as amendments to an unrelated tax bill that would derail
or limit implementation of the recently published final regulations revising the
definitions of who is exempt from the minimum wage and overtime requirements of
the Fair Labor Standards Act as a "white collar" employee. At press time,
this bill was still being debated and had not yet been voted on by the Senate.
Action by the House is also still to come.
The above information was taken from the
Payroll Currently, Issue #10 dated May 14, 2004.
On April
20, 2004, the U.S. Department of Labor issues final regulations revising the
definitions of who is exempt from the minimum wage and overtime requirements of
the Fair Labor Standards Act as a “white collar” employee for the first time in
more than 50 years.
The DOL
has created a “FairPay” web site providing information on the final rules at:
http://www.dol.gov/esa/regs/compliance/whd/fairpay/main.htm
 |
Any employee earning less
than $455 a week will be a nonexempt employee entitled to overtime pay. |
 |
The percentage restrictions
on nonexempt work in the current ‘long’ duties tests are eliminated. |
 |
The regulations will take
effect on August 23, 2004. |
 |
The compensation threshold
for the ‘highly compensated employee’ exemption is raised to $100,000. |
 |
Without affecting their
employees’ exempt status, employers may take deductions from accrued leave
accounts. |
A link is
provided to the National APA web site so you can review the regulations in
further detail -
http://www.americanpayroll.org/currently/pcwebpage
State Developments
Concerning Payroll Debit Cards
The interest in the
use of payroll debit cards as a payment option to reach the unbanked worker
population has increased in the last year. Stored value card use will continue
to grow in the future. A few states have addressed this issue and we will
probably see more legislative sessions addressing debit cards.
 |
Commonwealth of
Virginia in their recent bill actually created
some barriers: The bill mandated the creation of trust accounts when
employers set up payroll debit card programs. A trust account would be set up
for each employee in the program with the employee named as the beneficiary.
The general practice has been to set up a single aggregate account and this
trust concept could make these programs cost prohibitive. They will work on
correcting some of the language which would eliminate this trust requirement
and naming a beneficiary. |
 |
The Delaware
Department of Labor issued proposed regulations to allow employers to issue
payroll debit cards to workers as long as they provide the functional
equivalent of cash or a check that allows full payment of wages on the
worker’s payday without cost to the worker. Proposed regulations would allow
employers to pass on some of the administrative costs associated to a payroll
debit card program to the unbanked worker who voluntarily signs up for the
employer’s program. However, Delaware is also proposing “individual accounts”
and setting up individual accounts for each worker’s debit card may be too
expensive for an employer. |
Check Cashing Fees
Imposed on Non-accountholders by Banks Create a Dilemma for California Employers
and the State’s Labor Agency
 |
On March 14,
2004, the San Francisco Chronicle ran an article highlighting the fact
that some California banks have begun charging a $5.00 fee to workers who cash
their paycheck without having an account at that bank. This new policy even
applies to workers who present their paycheck at a local branch of a bank
where their employer’s payroll account is actually held. |
 |
The California
Department of Industrial Relations (CDIR) has ruled that employers who allow
such a fee to be charged to their workers when they cash their paychecks at
the employer’s bank were in violation of Section 212 of California’s labor
code. When the CDIR becomes aware that an employer has violated Section 212
of the California Labor Code, the CDIR can fine the employer $100 for the
first time a fee is charged to a worker to cash their paycheck. For each
subsequent violation, the CDIR can assess a $200 fine on the employer, plus an
additional 25% of the amount deducted from each of the worker’s paychecks.
|
 |
On May 31, 2004,
APA joined a panel of speakers to testify before the California State Senate
Banking, Commerce & International Trade Committee to discuss the impact of
these bank fees on workers, employers, and payroll professionals. The purpose
of this initial hearing was to help legislators gather information about the
entire issue so that they may potentially create a legislative solution for
this employer problem. |
Recent Developments
in Child Support
Nevada
 |
Nevada mandated a
new child support withholding fee of $2.00 for each employee effective July 1,
2003. This new employer-collected fee is required to be sent separately to
the Nevada State Treasurer and cannot accompany the child support garnishments
that are collected and remitted to the state. |
 |
Employers are not
required to withhold the fee until they receive official notification from the
state in the form of a mass mailer or a revised income withholding notice.
Out of state employers are not required to collect the fee. However, if they
are collecting the option $3.00 employer cost recovery fee, then they should
collect and remit the new $2.00 withholding fee. |
Massachusetts
 |
Effective January
1, 2004, Massachusetts implemented new regulations that obligate employers to
remit child support payments via EFT once they achieve a threshold of five or
more child support withholding orders. This mandate also applies to employers
who have a payment history with the Child Support Enforcement Division of the
Department of Revenue that includes two or more checks that have been returned
for insufficient funds or irregular/untimely payments. |
 |
An employer who
is required to participate in this new EFT child support remittance program
must register with the agency before transmitting funds and must validate
employees’/obligor’s personal identifying information with the agency’s child
support enforcement automated data system. |
 |
Employers using
payroll service providers may elect to have their provider remit these child
support withholding funds electronically to the Department of Revenue’s Child
Support Enforcement Division. |
Changes to Deferred
Compensation Plans
 |
Annual deferral
limits for 401k, 403b, SEP, and 457: 2004: $13K; 2005: $14K; 2006 and
forward: $15K |
 |
Catch-up allowed
for participants who will turn 50 during the plan year (not limited by any
other plan or discrimination rules): 2004: $3K; 2005: $4K; 2006 and forward:
$5K |
 |
All the states
with an income tax follow these changes, except for: NJ – follows EGTRRA for
401k, but does not exempt contributions to other deferred compensation plans
(457, 403b, SIMPLE, and SEP). PA – 401k and all other employee-deferral
retirement plans are completely taxable. |
APA Makes Headway
with IRS on Improving Some Forms and Publications:
 |
Form 941, State
Code Box: Clarified for EFTPS users that you should indicate the state of the
bank branch from which taxes are paid, if it is different than the state in
the employer’s address on the 941. Look for the redesign of Form 941. |
 |
W-2 box 10,
Dependent Care Benefits: Forfeitures do not have to be subtracted from the
amount to be reported. |
 |
W-2 box 11,
Nonqualified Plans: Instructions will be updated with APA-written language. |
 |
W-2 box 12,
Instructions tell employers to combine regular and “catch-up” contributions
into a single sum for each code. |
 |
W-2 box 13,
Instructions use APA-written language explaining when to check the “retirement
plan” box. |
 |
Form W-4,
directly underneath the title of the part of the form that the employee
provides to the employer, states: “Your employer must send a copy of this
form to the IRS if (a) you claim more than 10 allowances or (b) you claim
“Exempt” and your wages are normally more than $200 per week.” |
 |
Fill-in version
of Forms W-2c and W-3c are available on the APA Web Site
 |
www.americanpayroll.org/news/formW2c.html |
 |
Note: Fill out
the form on your computer screen, print out all copies you need, give it to
your employee, and file it with the SSA. The Social Security
Administration has approved this form. |
|
The above
information was taken from the Legislative and Regulatory Update Super Session
at the American Payroll Association’s 22nd Annual Congress –
presenters were Scott Mezistrano, CPP and Andrew McDevitt.
| |
|